Use Layers for Alternatives (Detach Layers)
I'm in the process of updating a layout to the new version of the software. In that process, I've decided to design two different alternatives for some optional add-ons to the layout. However, those alternatives are mutually exclusive and require replacing a couple of track segments in order to provide the correct interface to the main layout.
It would be nice if I could hide the layer for Option 1 and then connect tracks to the now (apparently) disconnected tracks on other layers in the Option 2 layer.
Essentially, it would be nice if there was a way to tell the system to pretend all tracks in a hidden layer didn't exist and/or were not connected to the tracks in the visible layer(s).
-
Charles commented
I've been think of something similar while designing a three deck layout with multiple helixes in between. As opposed to each of the three layers "stacked" which causes issues as the current version only allows for 1 0-level Baseboard and I need 3 different shapes. What about setting "anchors" at the ends of transition tracks, that could only be modified with very deliberate unlock and warning. These anchors would connect the ends of two tracks, each on different decks/layers that are drawn beside each other instead of above each other. This would have several advantages including the easy of viewing different decks side-by-side on the canvas as opposed to always toggling which layers are visible; each separate deck could have a different shape on the canvas while still being on the "Baseboard level"; and finally as this initial user desired, a way to create variations while each one is connected logically to the anchor point(s). Say, three variations all connecting to the same anchor, shown side-by-side on canvas. So in my use case the first helix (deck 0) grades up to the last track that transitions to next deck/level(1). You set the anchor point there. Then create a new Baseboard next to the first one on the canvas. In this new baseboard shape (deck1) you add an anchor point and tie it to the first one logically not graphically. Then continue the design for deck 1.
-
Carsten commented
I am in the very same situation where I "play" through various different versions in different layers.
It would be nice, if there would be an option in the preferences - next to the checkbox for "display disconnected joints" - allowing to display disconnected joints in similar layers where tracks are on top of each other in different layers after the layer has been duplicated. By default that option, like a checkbox, is disabled (for casual users) and can be enabled by advanced users. -
Technically it would be relatively easy to detach all tracks in such a hidden/detached layer.
However -
While it could be a useful feature for advanced users it would be potentially dangerous for casual users of the app, i.e. effectively offering an option to "shoot yourself in the foot" when activating this feature by accident and subsequently planning layouts that cannot be built physically.